Many-valued judgment aggregation: characterizing the possibility/impossibility boundary

DOI10.1016/J.JET.2012.07.005zbMATH Open1275.91041OpenAlexW2025979045MaRDI QIDQ1945846FDOQ1945846

Ashley Piggins, Conal Duddy

Publication date: 17 April 2013

Published in: Journal of Economic Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2012.07.005

zbMATH Keywords

many-valued logictriangular normzero divisorjudgment aggregationdeductive closure

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06) Many-valued logic (03B50)

Cited In (12)

• Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others
• An application of Peircean triadic logic: modelling vagueness
• Arrow's theorem and max-star transitivity
• Convex MV-algebras: many-valued logics meet decision theory
• Aggregating sets of judgments: two impossibility results compared. With a comment by Isaac Levi
• The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory
• The Problem of Judgment Aggregation in the Framework of Boolean-Valued Models
• A measure of distance between judgment sets
• On some oligarchy results when social preference is fuzzy
• Representing voting rules in Łukasiewicz’s three-valued logic
• Implausible alternatives in eliciting multi-attribute value functions
• Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation

This page was built for publication: Many-valued judgment aggregation: characterizing the possibility/impossibility boundary

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1945846)