Eliciting implicit assumptions of Mizar proofs by property omission

From MaRDI portal
Publication:1945901

DOI10.1007/S10817-012-9264-3zbMATH Open1260.68361arXiv1109.0633OpenAlexW3122106493MaRDI QIDQ1945901FDOQ1945901


Authors: Jesse Alama Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 17 April 2013

Published in: Journal of Automated Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: When formalizing proofs with interactive theorem provers, it often happens that extra background knowledge (declarative or procedural) about mathematical concepts is employed without the formalizer explicitly invoking it, to help the formalizer focus on the relevant details of the proof. In the contexts of producing and studying a formalized mathematical argument, such mechanisms are clearly valuable. But we may not always wish to suppress background knowledge. For certain purposes, it is important to know, as far as possible, precisely what background knowledge was implicitly employed in a formal proof. In this note we describe an experiment conducted on the MIZAR Mathematical Library of formal mathematical proofs to elicit one such class of implicitly employed background knowledge: properties of functions and relations (e.g., commutativity, asymmetry, etc.).


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1109.0633




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (2)

Uses Software





This page was built for publication: Eliciting implicit assumptions of Mizar proofs by property omission

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1945901)