Stratified belief bases revision with argumentative inference

DOI10.1007/S10992-011-9217-ZzbMATH Open1260.03024OpenAlexW1980623628MaRDI QIDQ1947030

Gabriele Kern-Isberner, Marcelo A. Falappa, Guillermo R. Simari, Alejandro J. García

Publication date: 11 April 2013

Published in: Journal of Philosophical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-011-9217-z

zbMATH Keywords

belief revisionargumentation systemsAGM model

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logics of knowledge and belief (including belief change) (03B42)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Argumentation in artificial intelligence
• Two modellings for theory change
• A survey of multiple contractions
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• A textbook of belief dynamics. Theory change and database updating
• On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions
• Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
• The Limit Assumption and Multiple Revision
• On the logic of theory change: safe contraction
• Preferential belief change using generalized epistemic entrenchment
• Explanations, belief revision and defeasible reasoning.
• Change in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: Adding an Argument
• Kernel contraction
• A logic-based theory of deductive arguments
• Weakening conflicting information for iterated revision and knowledge integration
• A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
• On the logic of iterated belief revision
• Comparing Argumentation Semantics with Respect to Skepticism
• Reversing the Levi identity
• A thorough axiomatization of a principle of conditional preservation in belief revision
• Expansion and contraction of finite states
• Prioritized and non-prioritized multiple change on belief bases
• Merging Logic Programs under Answer Set Semantics
• Belief revision and epistemology
• Skepticism relations for comparing argumentation semantics
• Three Scenarios for the Revision of Epistemic States
• Subjunctives, dispositions and chances
• Justification and defeat
• Resolving conflicting information
• Modelling Argument Accrual in Possibilistic Defeasible Logic Programming

Cited In (5)

• Merging existential rules programs in multi-agent contexts through credibility accrual
• A belief revision framework for revising epistemic states with partial epistemic states
• Merging operators on stratified belief bases equipped with argumentative inference
• AGM 25 years. Twenty-five years of research in belief change
• Belief revision and computational argumentation: a critical comparison

Recommendations

• A quantitative approach to belief revision in structured probabilistic argumentation 👍 👎
• Belief Revision in Structured Probabilistic Argumentation 👍 👎
• Rethinking epistemic logic with belief bases 👍 👎
• An extension-based approach to belief revision in abstract argumentation 👍 👎
• Interrogative belief revision based on epistemic strategies 👍 👎
• On stratified belief base compilation 👍 👎
• Abductive logics in a belief revision framework 👍 👎
• Consistency-based revision of structured belief bases 👍 👎
• Merging operators on stratified belief bases equipped with argumentative inference 👍 👎
• Belief revision and computational argumentation: a critical comparison 👍 👎

This page was built for publication: Stratified belief bases revision with argumentative inference

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1947030)