The false discovery rate for statistical pattern recognition

From MaRDI portal
Publication:1951997

DOI10.1214/09-EJS363zbMATH Open1326.62141arXiv0901.4184OpenAlexW2087245956MaRDI QIDQ1951997FDOQ1951997


Authors: Clayton Scott, Gowtham Bellala, Rebecca Willett Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 27 May 2013

Published in: Electronic Journal of Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: The false discovery rate (FDR) and false nondiscovery rate (FNDR) have received considerable attention in the literature on multiple testing. These performance measures are also appropriate for classification, and in this work we develop generalization error analyses for FDR and FNDR when learning a classifier from labeled training data. Unlike more conventional classification performance measures, the empirical FDR and FNDR are not binomial random variables but rather a ratio of binomials, which introduces challenges not addressed in conventional analyses. We develop distribution-free uniform deviation bounds and apply these to obtain finite sample bounds and strong universal consistency.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/0901.4184




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (8)





This page was built for publication: The false discovery rate for statistical pattern recognition

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1951997)