The weakest failure detectors to boost obstruction-freedom
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1954262
Recommendations
Cites work
- A performance evaluation of lock-free synchronization protocols
- Distributed Computing
- Distributed Computing
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1696684 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1179121 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2006647 (Why is no real title available?)
- Impossibility of distributed consensus with one faulty process
- Indulgent algorithms (preliminary version)
- Randomized wait-free concurrent objects (extended abstract)
- Robust wait-free hierarchies
- The weakest failure detector for solving consensus
- Toward a theory of transactional contention managers
- Unreliable failure detectors for reliable distributed systems
- Wait-free algorithms for fast, long-lived renaming
Cited in
(14)- Anonymity-preserving failure detectors
- Failure detectors encapsulate fairness
- The computational structure of progress conditions and shared objects
- Distributed universality
- The complexity of obstruction-free implementations
- Efficient Transformations of Obstruction-Free Algorithms into Non-blocking Algorithms
- The Weakest Failure Detectors to Boost Obstruction-Freedom
- Towards a universal construction for transaction-based multiprocess programs
- What can be computed in a distributed system?
- Contention-sensitive data structures and algorithms
- Distributed Computing
- Distributed Computing
- Abortable and query-abortable objects and their efficient implementation
- The minimum information about failures for solving non-local tasks in message-passing systems
This page was built for publication: The weakest failure detectors to boost obstruction-freedom
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1954262)