Geometry and destiny
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1964549
DOI10.1023/A:1026757718530zbMATH Open0932.83054arXivastro-ph/9904020MaRDI QIDQ1964549FDOQ1964549
Authors: Lawrence M. Krauss, Michael S. Turner 
Publication date: 20 February 2000
Published in: General Relativity and Gravitation (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: The recognition that the cosmological constant may be non-zero forces us to re-evaluate standard notions about the connection between geometry and the fate of our Universe. An open Universe can recollapse, and a closed Universe can expand forever. As a corollary, we point out that there is no set of cosmological observations we can perform that will unambiguously allow us to determine what the ultimate destiny of the Universe will be.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9904020
Recommendations
Macroscopic interaction of the gravitational field with matter (hydrodynamics, etc.) (83C55) Relativistic cosmology (83F05)
Cites Work
Cited In (9)
- Laudatores temporis acti, or why cosmology is alive and well -- A reply to Disney
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- From spacetime foam to holographic foam cosmology
- THE CONSISTENT NEWTONIAN LIMIT OF EINSTEIN'S GRAVITY WITH A COSMOLOGICAL CONSTANT
- MAKING SENSE OF THE NEW COSMOLOGY
- WHAT WE KNOW AND WHAT WE DON'T KNOW ABOUT THE UNIVERSE
- The nature of singularity in Bianchi I cosmological string gravity model with second order curvature corrections
- Markov chains, products of random matrices, and the main problem of modern eschatology
- On bounded and unbounded dynamics of the Hamiltonian system for unified scalar field cosmology
This page was built for publication: Geometry and destiny
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1964549)
