Brown's paradox in the estimated confidence approach
DOI10.1214/AOS/1018031210zbMATH Open0946.62009OpenAlexW2040719918WikidataQ63641694 ScholiaQ63641694MaRDI QIDQ1970482FDOQ1970482
Authors: Hsiuying Wang
Publication date: 7 June 2000
Published in: The Annals of Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1018031210
Recommendations
confidence intervalancillary statisticcoverage functionempirical Bayes estimatorsusual constant coverage probability estimator
Parametric tolerance and confidence regions (62F25) Empirical decision procedures; empirical Bayes procedures (62C12) Admissibility in statistical decision theory (62C15)
Cites Work
Cited In (13)
- Admissibility of the constant-coverage probability estimator for estimating the coverage function of certain confidence interval
- The estimation of stratum means vector with random sample sizes
- An ancillary paradox in testing
- Improved confidence estimators for confidence sets of location parameters
- Functional Modelling and Classification of Longitudinal Data*
- Admissibility of confidence estimators in the regression model
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- An ancillarity paradox which appears in multiple linear regression
- Estimated confidence under ancillary statistic everywhere-valid constraint
- Multivariate control charts based on the James-Stein estimator
- Self-Modelling Warping Functions
- Note on a paradox in decision-theoretic interval estimation
- Resolution of godambe's paradox
This page was built for publication: Brown's paradox in the estimated confidence approach
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1970482)