Regarding `Leibniz equivalence'

DOI10.1007/s10701-020-00325-9zbMath1436.83012OpenAlexW3004299942WikidataQ123221945 ScholiaQ123221945MaRDI QIDQ1985876

Bryan W. Roberts

Publication date: 7 April 2020

Published in: Foundations of Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-020-00325-9

zbMATH Keywords

spacetimegeneral relativityhole argumentsubstantivalismLeibniz equivalencerelationism

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophy of mathematics (00A30) History of mathematics in the 20th century (01A60) Geometrodynamics and the holographic principle (83E05) Einstein's equations (general structure, canonical formalism, Cauchy problems) (83C05) History of relativity and gravitational theory (83-03)

Related Items (4)

Representation and Spacetime: The Hole Argument Revisited ⋮ Invariance or equivalence: a tale of two principles ⋮ Some remarks on recent formalist responses to the hole argument ⋮ New perspectives on the hole argument

Cites Work

• Particle creation by black holes
• A hole revolution, or are we back where we started?
• The hole argument against everything
• The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences. Richard courant lecture in mathematical sciences delivered at New York University, May 11, 1959
• The Hole Truth
• General Relativity for Mathematicians
• The Hawking Information Loss Paradox: The Anatomy of Controversy
• Regarding the ‘Hole Argument’
• Quantum Gravity
• The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time
• Interpreting Quantum Theories
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: Regarding `Leibniz equivalence'