Conservation laws of femtosecond pulse propagation described by generalized nonlinear Schrödinger equation with cubic nonlinearity
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1998386
DOI10.1016/j.matcom.2020.11.009OpenAlexW3106431252MaRDI QIDQ1998386
Alexander Razgulin, Svetlana Stepanenko, Vyacheslav A. Trofimov
Publication date: 6 March 2021
Published in: Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2020.11.009
Numerical methods for partial differential equations, initial value and time-dependent initial-boundary value problems (65Mxx) Partial differential equations of mathematical physics and other areas of application (35Qxx)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- The nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Singular solutions and optical collapse
- New conservative difference schemes for a coupled nonlinear Schrödinger system
- 1-soliton solution and conservation laws for nonlinear wave equation in semiconductors
- Energy conservation issues in the numerical solution of the semilinear wave equation
- Difference schemes for solving the generalized nonlinear Schrödinger equation
- A quantum mechanics analogy for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation in the finite line
- Derivation of the discrete conservation laws for a family of finite difference schemes
- On a new approach to the simulation of the nonlinear propagation of ultrashort laser pulses
- A new numerical scheme for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation with wave operator
- Propagation of ultra-short optical pulses in cubic nonlinear media
- Numerical simulation of nonlinear Schrödinger systems: A new conservative scheme
- Novel exact solutions to the short pulse equation
- Conservative difference schemes for some problems of femtosecond nonlinear optics
- Discrete transparent boundary conditions for the Schrödinger equation: fast calculation, approximation, and stability
- Numerical Algorithms for Schrödinger Equation with Artificial Boundary Conditions
- COMPARISON OF FINITE‐DIFFERENCE SCHEMES FOR THE GROSS‐PITAEVSKII EQUATION
