Comparison between the non-crossing and the non-crossing on lines properties

From MaRDI portal
Publication:1998635

DOI10.1016/J.JMAA.2021.124956zbMATH Open1471.46031arXiv2004.08252OpenAlexW3120135795MaRDI QIDQ1998635FDOQ1998635


Authors: Aldo Pratelli, Daniel Campbell, Emanuela Radici Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 7 March 2021

Published in: Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: In the recent paper [2], it was proved that the closure of the planar diffeomorphisms in the Sobolev norm consists of the functions which are non-crossing (NC), i.e., the functions which can be uniformly approximated by continuous one-to-one functions on the grids. A deep simplification of this property is to consider curves instead of grids, so considering functions which are non-crossing on lines (NCL). Since the NCL property is way easier to check, it would be extremely positive if they actually coincide, while it is only obvious that NC implies NCL. We show that in general NCL does not imply NC, but the implication becomes true with the additional assumption that det(Du)>0 a.e., which is a very common assumption in nonlinear elasticity.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.08252




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (1)





This page was built for publication: Comparison between the non-crossing and the non-crossing on lines properties

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1998635)