On the wildness of Cambrian lattices

DOI10.1007/S10468-018-9789-1zbMATH Open1436.16014arXiv1704.01861OpenAlexW2606437022WikidataQ129884851 ScholiaQ129884851MaRDI QIDQ2000889FDOQ2000889

Baptiste Rognerud, F. Chapoton

Publication date: 1 July 2019

Published in: Algebras and Representation Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: In this note, we investigate the representation type of the cambrian lattices and some other related lattices. The result is expressed as a very simple trichotomy. When the rank of the underlined Coxeter group is at most 2, the lattices are of finite representation type. When the Coxeter group is a reducible group of type A 3 1 , the lattices are of tame representation type. In all the other cases they are of wild representation type.

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.01861

Recommendations

• From the Tamari lattice to Cambrian lattices and beyond.
• Cambrian triangulations and their tropical realizations
• On the topology of the Cambrian semilattices.
• On the topology of the Cambrian semilattices.
• Cambrian lattices.
• A Cambrian framework for the oriented cycle
• On the topology of the Cambrian semilattices (extended abstract).
• Lattice Animals and Self-Organized Criticality
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 15995
• Sortable elements and Cambrian lattices.

zbMATH Keywords

posetrepresentation typeCambrian

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Cluster algebras (13F60) Representations of quivers and partially ordered sets (16G20) Representation type (finite, tame, wild, etc.) of associative algebras (16G60)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Cambrian lattices.
• Sortable elements and Cambrian lattices.
• Generalized noncrossing partitions and combinatorics of Coxeter groups
• On derived equivalences of categories of sheaves over finite posets
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Partially ordered sets of finite type
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Homological properties of piecewise hereditary algebras.
• Which Canonical Algebras are Derived Equivalent to Incidence Algebras of Posets?
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Oriented flip graphs of polygonal subdivisions and noncrossing tree partitions
• PARTIALLY ORDERED SETS OF INFINITE TYPE
• On Stokes sets.
• Stokes posets and serpent nests
• The completely separating incidence algebras of tame representation type
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Representation-tame incidence algebras of finite posets
• Title not available (Why is that?)

Cited In (5)

• On the topology of the Cambrian semilattices.
• Ungarian Markov chains
• Deep questions about the nature of early-life signals: a commentary on Lister (1673) ‘A description of certain stones figured like plants’
• Cambrian triangulations and their tropical realizations
• The bounded derived categories of the Tamari lattices are fractionally Calabi-Yau

Uses Software

• MathOverflow

This page was built for publication: On the wildness of Cambrian lattices

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2000889)