Handling imprecise and missing evaluations in multi-criteria majority-rule sorting
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2002857
DOI10.1016/J.COR.2019.05.027zbMATH Open1458.90396OpenAlexW2947032070WikidataQ127796665 ScholiaQ127796665MaRDI QIDQ2002857FDOQ2002857
Alexandru-Liviu Olteanu, Patrick Meyer
Publication date: 12 July 2019
Published in: Computers \& Operations Research (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2019.05.027
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- RUBIS: a bipolar-valued outranking method for the choice problem
- Optimization by Simulated Annealing
- Simulation techniques for the sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria decision models
- Inferrring an ELECTRE TRI model from assignment examples
- A user-oriented implementation of the ELECTRE-TRI method integrating preference elicitation support
- Evaluation and decision models with multiple criteria. Stepping stones for the analyst.
- Using assignment examples to infer weights for ELECTRE TRI method: some experimental results.
- An axiomatic approach to noncompensatory sorting methods in MCDM. I: The case of two categories
- Logical foundation of fuzzy preferential systems with application to the electre decision aid methods
- An aggregation/disaggregation approach to obtain robust conclusions with ELECTRE TRI
- Resolving inconsistencies among constraints on the parameters of an MCDA model
- Handling effects of reinforced preference and counter-veto in credibility of outranking
- On computing ELECTRE's credibility indices under partial information
- Using assignment examples to infer category limits for the ELECTRE TRI method
- An axiomatic approach to noncompensatory sorting methods in MCDM. II: M ore than two categories
- An axiomatic characterization of different majority concepts
- Dealing with inconsistent judgments in multiple criteria sorting models
- Integrating large positive and negative performance differences into multicriteria majority-rule sorting models
- Learning a Majority Rule Model from Large Sets of Assignment Examples
- Learning the Parameters of a Multiple Criteria Sorting Method
- Handling imprecise evaluations in multiple criteria decision aiding and robust ordinal regression by \(n\)-point intervals
Cited In (9)
- A generalized approach to ordinal classification based on the comparison of actions with either limiting or characteristic profiles
- Ranking with multiple reference points: efficient SAT-based learning procedures
- Inferring a hierarchical majority-rule sorting model
- Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets, Data Mining, and Granular Computing
- Recommending multiple criteria decision analysis methods with a new taxonomy-based decision support system
- A MIP-based approach to learn MR-sort models with single-peaked preferences
- Multiple criteria sorting models and methods. II: Theoretical results and general issues
- Generalization of stable preference ordering towards ideal solution approach for working with imprecise data
- A theoretical look at ordinal classification methods based on comparing actions with limiting boundaries between adjacent classes
Uses Software
This page was built for publication: Handling imprecise and missing evaluations in multi-criteria majority-rule sorting
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2002857)