Antimagic labelings of caterpillars

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2008558

DOI10.1016/J.AMC.2018.11.043zbMATH Open1428.05274arXiv1708.00624OpenAlexW2744449504MaRDI QIDQ2008558FDOQ2008558


Authors: Antoni Lozano, Mercè Mora, Carlos Seara Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 26 November 2019

Published in: Applied Mathematics and Computation (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: A k-antimagic labeling of a graph G is an injection from E(G) to 1,2,dots,|E(G)|+k such that all vertex sums are pairwise distinct, where the vertex sum at vertex u is the sum of the labels assigned to edges incident to u. We call a graph k-antimagic when it has a k-antimagic labeling, and antimagic when it is 0-antimagic. Hartsfield and Ringel conjectured that every simple connected graph other than K2 is antimagic, but the conjecture is still open even for trees. Here we study k-antimagic labelings of caterpillars, which are defined as trees the removal of whose leaves produces a path, called its spine. As a general result, we use constructive techniques to prove that any caterpillar of order n is (lfloor(n1)/2floor2)-antimagic. Furthermore, if C is a caterpillar with a spine of order s, we prove that when C has at least lfloor(3s+1)/2floor leaves or lfloor(s1)/2floor consecutive vertices of degree at most 2 at one end of a longest path, then C is antimagic. As a consequence of a result by Wong and Zhu, we also prove that if p is a prime number, any caterpillar with a spine of order p, p1 or p2 is 1-antimagic.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.00624




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (17)





This page was built for publication: Antimagic labelings of caterpillars

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2008558)