Antimagic labelings of caterpillars
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2008558
DOI10.1016/J.AMC.2018.11.043zbMATH Open1428.05274arXiv1708.00624OpenAlexW2744449504MaRDI QIDQ2008558FDOQ2008558
Authors: Antoni Lozano, Mercè Mora, Carlos Seara
Publication date: 26 November 2019
Published in: Applied Mathematics and Computation (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: A -antimagic labeling of a graph is an injection from to such that all vertex sums are pairwise distinct, where the vertex sum at vertex is the sum of the labels assigned to edges incident to . We call a graph -antimagic when it has a -antimagic labeling, and antimagic when it is 0-antimagic. Hartsfield and Ringel conjectured that every simple connected graph other than is antimagic, but the conjecture is still open even for trees. Here we study -antimagic labelings of caterpillars, which are defined as trees the removal of whose leaves produces a path, called its spine. As a general result, we use constructive techniques to prove that any caterpillar of order is -antimagic. Furthermore, if is a caterpillar with a spine of order , we prove that when has at least leaves or consecutive vertices of degree at most 2 at one end of a longest path, then is antimagic. As a consequence of a result by Wong and Zhu, we also prove that if is a prime number, any caterpillar with a spine of order , or is -antimagic.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.00624
Recommendations
- Product antimagic labeling of caterpillars
- Caterpillars Have Antimagic Orientations
- Caterpillars are antimagic
- Antimagic orientation of subdivided caterpillars
- Anti-magic labeling of trees
- Caterpillars with maximum degree 3 are antimagic
- Weighted antimagic labeling
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2186481
- Antimagic labelings of antiprisms
Trees (05C05) Coloring of graphs and hypergraphs (05C15) Graph labelling (graceful graphs, bandwidth, etc.) (05C78)
Cites Work
- On zero-sum partitions and anti-magic trees
- Antimagic labelling of vertex weighted graphs
- Combinatorial Nullstellensatz
- Lattice grids and prisms are antimagic
- Dense graphs are antimagic
- Weighted antimagic labeling: an algorithmic approach
- Regular bipartite graphs are antimagic
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Antimagic Properties of Graphs with Large Maximum Degree
- Anti‐magic graphs via the Combinatorial NullStellenSatz
- Computing and Combinatorics
- On anti-magic labeling for graph products
- The antimagicness of the Cartesian product of graphs
- Antimagic labeling of cubic graphs
- Antimagic Labeling of Regular Graphs
- Anti-magic labeling of trees
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- A new class of antimagic Cartesian product graphs
- Approximate results for rainbow labelings
- Graphs of large linear size are antimagic
- Regular Graphs of Odd Degree Are Antimagic
- Antimagic labeling of generalized pyramid graphs
Cited In (17)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Every graph is homeomorphic to an antimagic bipartite graph
- Perfectly antimagic total labeling of star-like trees and the corona product of two graphs
- Caterpillars with maximum degree 3 are antimagic
- Antimagic labeling of forests with sets of consecutive integers
- Antimagic orientation of lobsters
- Caterpillars are antimagic
- Antimagic orientations for the complete \(k\)-ary trees
- On \(k\)-shifted antimagic spider forests
- Antimagic labeling of some biregular bipartite graphs
- List-antimagic labeling of vertex-weighted graphs
- Trees whose even-degree vertices induce a path are antimagic
- Shifted-antimagic labelings for graphs
- A lower bound and several exact results on the \(d\)-lucky number
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Antimagic labeling for unions of graphs with many three-paths
This page was built for publication: Antimagic labelings of caterpillars
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2008558)