On set systems without a simplex-cluster and the junta method

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2010639

DOI10.1016/J.JCTA.2019.105139zbMATH Open1428.05306arXiv1804.01026OpenAlexW2977312316WikidataQ127179677 ScholiaQ127179677MaRDI QIDQ2010639FDOQ2010639


Authors: Noam Lifshitz Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 27 November 2019

Published in: Journal of Combinatorial Theory. Series A (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: A family A0,ldots,Ad of k-element subsets of [n]=1,2,ldots,n is called a simplex-cluster if A0capcdotscapAd=varnothing, |A0cupcdotscupAd|le2k, and the intersection of any d of the sets in A0,ldots,Ad is nonempty. In 2006, Keevash and Mubayi conjectured that for any d+1leklefracdd+1n, the largest family of k-element subsets of [n] that does not contain a simplex-cluster is the family of all k-subsets that contain a given element. We prove the conjecture for all kgezetan for an arbitrarily small zeta>0, provided that ngen0(zeta,d). We call a family A0,ldots,Ad of k-element subsets of [n] a (d,k,s)-cluster if A0capcdotscapAd=varnothing and |A0cupcdotscupAd|les. We also show that for any zetanleklefracdd+1n the largest family of k-element subsets of [n] that does not contain a (d,k,(fracd+1d+zeta)k)-cluster is again the family of all k-subsets that contain a given element, provided that ngen0(zeta,d). Our proof is based on the junta method for extremal combinatorics initiated by Dinur and Friedgut and further developed by Ellis, Keller, and the author.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.01026




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (9)





This page was built for publication: On set systems without a simplex-cluster and the junta method

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2010639)