A comparison between active strain and active stress in transversely isotropic hyperelastic materials

DOI10.1007/S10659-018-9708-ZMaRDI QIDQ2010705zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors A. Musesti, Davide Riccobelli, G. Giantesio

Publication date 27 November 2019

Published in Journal of Elasticity (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.04977

zbMATH Keywords

activationhyperelasticitysimple shear

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Nonlinear elasticity (74B20) Anisotropy in solid mechanics (74E10) Biomechanical solid mechanics (74L15)

Abstract: Active materials are media for which deformations can occur in absence of loads, given an external stimulus. Two approaches to the modeling of such materials are mainly used in literature, both based on the introduction of a new tensor: an additive stress $mathsf{P}_{e}xtact$ in the active stress case and a multiplicative strain $mathsf{F}_a$ in the active strain one. Aim of this paper is the comparison between the two approaches on simple shears. Considering an incompressible and transversely isotropic material, we design constitutive relations for $mathsf{P}_{e}xtact$ and $mathsf{F}_a$ so that they produce the same results for a uniaxial deformation along the symmetry axis. We then study the two approaches in the case of a simple shear deformation. In a hyperelastic setting, we show that the two approaches produce different stress components along a simple shear, unless some necessary conditions on the strain energy density are fulfilled. However, such conditions are very restrictive and rule out the usual elastic strain energy functionals. Active stress and active strain therefore produce different results in shear, even if they both fit uniaxial data. Our results show that experimental data on the stress-stretch response on uniaxial deformations are not enough to establish which activation approach can capture better the mechanics of active materials. We conclude that other types of deformations, beyond the uniaxial one, should be taken into consideration in the modeling of such materials.

Recommendations

• On the choice of stress-dependent elastic moduli for transversely isotropic solids
• Stress-strain state of a transversely isotropic half-space with paraboloidal basis with different elastic characteristics
• The elasticity tensor of a transversely isotropic hyperelastic material with residual stress
• Active stress vs. active strain in mechanobiology: constitutive issues
• A new hyperelastic model for transversely isotropic solids
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1523964
• Investigation of strain localization in elastoplastic materials with transversely isotropic elasticity.
• Incompressible transversely isotropic hyperelastic materials and their linearized counterparts
• Anisotropic hyperelasticity based upon general strain measures
• On the active part of the stress for elastic materials with internal constraints

Cites work

• A 3D electro-mechanical continuum model for simulating skeletal muscle contraction
• A continuum constitutive model for the active behaviour of skeletal muscle
• A numerical model of passive and active behavior of skeletal muscles
• Active stress vs. active strain in mechanobiology: constitutive issues
• An orthotropic active-strain model for the myocardium mechanics and its numerical approximation
• Cardiac electromechanics: the effect of contraction model on the mathematical problem and accuracy of the numerical scheme
• Electromechanical coupling in cardiac dynamics: the active strain approach
• Finite strains of viscoelastic muscle tissue
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2144892 (Why is no real title available?)
• Loss of mass and performance in skeletal muscle tissue: a continuum model
• Modeling heart development
• Modeling the chemoelectromechanical behavior of skeletal muscle using the parallel open-source software library OpenCMISS
• On the active response of soft living tissues
• Simple shearing of soft biological tissues
• Stability of active muscle tissue

Cited in

(9)

• Characterization and modeling of compliant active materials.
• Active stress vs. active strain in mechanobiology: constitutive issues
• Machine learning of multiscale active force generation models for the efficient simulation of cardiac electromechanics
• AFCs: active-stress vs. Active-strain modeling
• Mechanics of soft active materials with phase evolution
• Electrochemo-poromechanics of ionic polymer metal composites: towards the accurate finite element modelling of actuation and sensing
• Numerical evaluation of elasto-mechanical and visco-elastic electro-mechanical models of the human heart
• On the modeling of active deformation in biological transversely isotropic materials
• Nonlinear Cauchy elasticity

Describes a project that uses

Uses Software

• OpenCMISS

This page was built for publication: A comparison between active strain and active stress in transversely isotropic hyperelastic materials

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2010705)