New bounds on the strength of some restrictions of Hindman's theorem
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2011655
DOI10.1007/978-3-319-58741-7_21zbMATH Open1496.03242arXiv1701.06095OpenAlexW2963872185MaRDI QIDQ2011655FDOQ2011655
Authors: Lorenzo Carlucci, Leszek Aleksander Kołodziejczyk, Francesco Lepore, Konrad Zdanowski
Publication date: 4 August 2017
Abstract: We prove upper and lower bounds on the effective content and logical strength for a variety of natural restrictions of Hindman's Finite Sums Theorem. For example, we show that Hindman's Theorem for sums of length at most 2 and 4 colors implies . An emerging {em leitmotiv} is that the known lower bounds for Hindman's Theorem and for its restriction to sums of at most 2 elements are already valid for a number of restricted versions which have simple proofs and better computability- and proof-theoretic upper bounds than the known upper bound for the full version of the theorem. We highlight the role of a sparsity-like condition on the solution set, which we call apartness.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.06095
Recommendations
- New bounds on the strength of some restrictions of Hindman’s Theorem
- ``Weak yet strong restrictions of Hindman's finite sums theorem
- Effectiveness of Hindman’s Theorem for Bounded Sums
- A weak variant of Hindman's theorem stronger than Hilbert's theorem
- The reverse mathematics of Hindman's theorem for sums of exactly two elements
Cites Work
- Finite sums from sequences within cells of a partition of N
- Subsystems of second order arithmetic
- On the strength of Ramsey's theorem for pairs
- The metamathematics of Stable Ramsey’s Theorem for Pairs
- Slicing the truth. On the computable and reverse mathematics of combinatorial principles
- Open questions in reverse mathematics
- On the role of the collection principle for \(\Sigma ^0_2\)-formulas in second-order reverse mathematics
- The Existence of Certain Ultrafilters on N and a Conjecture of Graham and Rothschild
- Open Problems in Partition Regularity
- Cohesive avoidance and strong reductions
- Hilbert versus Hindman
- The polarized Ramsey's theorem
- A weak variant of Hindman's theorem stronger than Hilbert's theorem
- Effectiveness of Hindman’s Theorem for Bounded Sums
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- The strength of Ramsey's theorem for coloring relatively large sets
Cited In (8)
- ``Weak yet strong restrictions of Hindman's finite sums theorem
- Effectiveness of Hindman’s Theorem for Bounded Sums
- Note on finitary Hindman numbers
- A weak variant of Hindman's theorem stronger than Hilbert's theorem
- Hindman's theorem for sums along the full binary tree, \(\Sigma^0_2\)-induction and the pigeonhole principle for trees
- New bounds on the strength of some restrictions of Hindman’s Theorem
- New bounds in Balog-Szemerédi-Gowers theorem
- Title not available (Why is that?)
This page was built for publication: New bounds on the strength of some restrictions of Hindman's theorem
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2011655)