If nudge cannot be applied: a litmus test of the readers' stance on paternalism

DOI10.1007/S11238-013-9375-2zbMATH Open1290.91048OpenAlexW2019893511MaRDI QIDQ2015038FDOQ2015038

Authors: Chen Li, Zhihua Li, Peter P. Wakker 

Publication date: 18 June 2014

Published in: Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-013-9375-2

Recommendations

• Old wine in new casks: libertarian paternalism still violates liberal principles
• Decision sciences and the new case for paternalism: three welfare-related justificatory challenges
• Informed desire and the ambitions of libertarian paternalism
• Choice theoretic foundation for libertarian paternalism: reconciling the behavioral and Libertarian approaches to welfare
• Psychology implies paternalism? Bounded rationality may reduce the rationale to regulate risk-taking

zbMATH Keywords

debiasinglibertarian paternalismchoice inconsistencynudgestandard gamble

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06)

Cites Work

• Incomplete preferences and rational intransitivity of choice
• Expected utility theory without the completeness axiom.
• Multiperson utility
• The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice
• Regret in Decision Making under Uncertainty
• Making descriptive use of prospect theory to improve the prescriptive use of expected utility
• Resolving inconsistencies in utility measurement under risk: tests of generalizations of expected utility
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• The shape of incomplete preferences
• Measuring constructed preferences: Towards a building code. (With commentaries)
• Using a Bayesian approach to quantify scale compatibility bias
• Inconsistent Trade-Offs Between Attributes: New Evidence in Preference Assessment Biases
• Beyond revealed preference: choice-theoretic foundations for behavioral welfare economics
• Randomization vs. Selection: How to Choose in the Absence of Preference?
• Is addiction ``rational? Theory and evidence
• Reconciling normative and behavioural economics: the problems to be solved
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Why we should not be silent about noise
• The ratio bias phenomenon: fact or artifact?
• Explaining risky choices without assuming preferences
• Rationality for economists? (With commentaries)
• Title not available (Why is that?)

Cited In (2)

• Old wine in new casks: libertarian paternalism still violates liberal principles
• Decision sciences and the new case for paternalism: three welfare-related justificatory challenges

This page was built for publication: If nudge cannot be applied: a litmus test of the readers' stance on paternalism

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2015038)