On the choice of weights for aggregating judgments in non-negotiable AHP group decision making
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2028867
Recommendations
- Deriving the weights for aggregating judgments in a multi-group problem: an application to curriculum development in entrepreneurship
- Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: An evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members' weightages
- An experiment on the consistency of aggregated comparison matrices in AHP
- Group preference aggregation with the AHP -- implications for multiple-issue agendas
- Study on the determination of weight coefficients in AHP group decision
Cites work
- A cosine maximization method for the priority vector derivation in AHP
- A heuristic approach for deriving the priority vector in AHP
- A new rank correlation coefficient with application to the consensus ranking problem
- A peer-to-peer dynamic adaptive consensus reaching model for the group AHP decision making
- Achieving matrix consistency in AHP through linearization
- Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process
- Consistent completion of incomplete judgments in decision making using AHP
- Dispersion of group judgments
- Empirical properties of group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: theory and evidence
- Geometry of decision making and the vector space formulation of the analytic hierarchy process
- Group preference aggregation in the multiplicative AHP. The model of the group decision process and Pareto optimality
- Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: An evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members' weightages
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3943488 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3972536 (Why is no real title available?)
- Improving consistency in AHP decision-making processes
- Pareto Optimality and Equity in Social Decision Analysis
- Procedures for synthesizing ratio judgements
- Singular value decomposition in AHP.
- Solving the least squares method problem in the AHP for \(3 \times 3\) and \(4\times 4\) matrices
- The ACT (STATIS method)
Cited in
(17)- When to combine group judgments and when not to in the analytic hierarchy process: a new method
- Dispersion of group judgments
- Symmetric projection group approach for promoting homogeneity in the analytic hierarchy process
- Deriving Weights of the Decision Makers Using AHP Group Consistency Measures
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6719037 (Why is no real title available?)
- DETERMINING AGGREGATE CRITERIA WEIGHTS FROM CRITERIA RANKINGS BY A GROUP OF DECISION MAKERS
- Determining compromise weights for group decision making
- Study on the determination of weight coefficients in AHP group decision
- An MCDM approach to group processes using Choquet integration
- Research on the optimal aggregation method of judgment matrices based on spatial Steiner-Weber point
- Incomplete pairwise comparison matrices based on graphs with average degree approximately 3
- Deriving the weights for aggregating judgments in a multi-group problem: an application to curriculum development in entrepreneurship
- Analytical hierarchy process: revolution and evolution
- Group AHP framework based on geometric standard deviation and interval group pairwise comparisons
- Obviating some of the theoretical barriers of analytical hierarchy process by a revised eigenvector method: a case study in sustainable supplier selection
- Aggregating judgments in non negotiable group decisions with external information in transport systems
- An axiom system of the analytic hierarchy process based on the completeness of preferences
This page was built for publication: On the choice of weights for aggregating judgments in non-negotiable AHP group decision making
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2028867)
