Combining holistic and decomposition paradigms in preference modeling with the flexibility of FITradeoff

DOI10.1007/S10100-020-00728-ZMaRDI QIDQ2033305zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Adiel Teixeira de Almeida, Eduarda Asfora Frej, Lucia Reis Peixoto Roselli

Publication date 16 June 2021

Published in CEJOR. Central European Journal of Operations Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-020-00728-z

zbMATH Keywords

elicitation by decompositionFITradeoff methodflexibilityholistic evaluationmulti-criteria decision making/aiding (MCDM/A)preference modelling

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Operations research and management science (90Bxx)

Cites work

• A benefit-to-cost ratio based approach for portfolio selection under multiple criteria with incomplete preference information
• A multicriteria decision model for supplier selection in a food industry based on fitradeoff method
• A new method for elicitation of criteria weights in additive models: flexible and interactive tradeoff
• A parallel between regret theory and outranking methods for multicriteria decision making under imprecise information
• Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision- making, the UTA method
• Comparison of Weighting Judgments in Multiattribute Utility Measurement
• Decision making with incomplete information
• Exploring cognitive aspects of FITradeoff method using neuroscience tools
• Heuristics for selecting pair-wise elicitation questions in multiple criteria choice problems
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 46735 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1149813 (Why is no real title available?)
• Kernel-based learning methods for preference aggregation
• Modeling assignment-based pairwise comparisons within integrated framework for value-driven multiple criteria sorting
• Multicriteria and multiobjective models for risk, reliability and maintenance decision analysis
• Multiple criteria decision analysis. State of the art surveys. In 2 volumes
• Preface: Operations research in neuroscience. II
• Rational decision making.

Cited in

(6)

• A tribute to Rudolf vetschera
• Can holistic declaration of preferences improve a negotiation offer scoring system?
• The use of the success‐based decision rule to support the holistic evaluation process in FITradeoff
• A multicriteria model to support the selection of inspection service providers based on the delay time model
• Best-worst tradeoff method
• Analysis of the cognitive aspects of the preference elicitation process in the compensatory context: a neuroscience experiment with FITradeoff

Describes a project that uses

Uses Software

• FITradeoff
• M-MACBETH
• UTA Plus

This page was built for publication: Combining holistic and decomposition paradigms in preference modeling with the flexibility of FITradeoff

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2033305)