The circumcentered-reflection method achieves better rates than alternating projections

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2044486

DOI10.1007/S10589-021-00275-6zbMATH Open1470.49058arXiv2007.14466OpenAlexW3046171782MaRDI QIDQ2044486FDOQ2044486


Authors: Reza Arefidamghani, Roger Behling, Luiz-Rafael Santos, Yunier Y. Bello Cruz, Alfredo Iusem Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 9 August 2021

Published in: Computational Optimization and Applications (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We study the convergence rate of the Circumcentered-Reflection Method (CRM) for solving the convex feasibility problem and compare it with the Method of Alternating Projections (MAP). Under an error bound assumption, we prove that both methods converge linearly, with asymptotic constants depending on a parameter of the error bound, and that the one derived for CRM is strictly better than the one for MAP. Next, we analyze two classes of fairly generic examples. In the first one, the angle between the convex sets approaches zero near the intersection, so that the MAP sequence converges sublinearly, but CRM still enjoys linear convergence. In the second class of examples, the angle between the sets does not vanish and MAP exhibits its standard behavior, i.e., it converges linearly, yet, perhaps surprisingly, CRM attains superlinear convergence.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.14466




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (11)





This page was built for publication: The circumcentered-reflection method achieves better rates than alternating projections

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2044486)