No more than 2d+1-2 nearly neighbourly simplices in R^d
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2046444
Abstract: We prove a combinatorial theorem on families of disjoint sub-boxes of a discrete cube, which implies that there are at most nearly neighbourly simplices in .
A family of \(d\)-simplices in \({\mathbb R}^d\) is called \textit{nearly neighbourly} if every two members are separated by a hyperplane that contains a facet of each. In this paper it is shown that \(2^{d+1}-2\) is an upper bound for the cardinality of a nearly neighbourly family of \(d\)-simplices. The previous upper bound was \(2^{d+1}-1\).
Recommendations
Cites work
- A Conjecture Concerning Neighboring Tetrahedra
- Analysis of Boolean Functions
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3888434 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1318047 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3205160 (Why is no real title available?)
- Nearly-neighborly families of tetrahedra and the decomposition of some multigraphs
- Neighborly families of \(2^ k\) k-simplices in \(E^ k\).
- No nine neighborly tetrahedra exist
- On the decomposition ofkn into complete bipartite graphs
- Proofs from THE BOOK
Cited in
(6)- Nearly-neighborly families of tetrahedra and the decomposition of some multigraphs
- Sections of simplices
- On the number of pairwise touching simplices
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3888434 (Why is no real title available?)
- On the number of neighborly simplices in \(\mathbb{R}^d\)
- Bounds on the cardinalities of families of nearly neighborly quadrilaterals
This page was built for publication: No more than \(2^{d+1}-2\) nearly neighbourly simplices in \({\mathbb{R}}^d\)
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2046444)