Duhem's problem revisited: logical versus epistemic formulations and solutions

DOI10.1007/S11229-018-1845-1zbMATH Open1475.62072OpenAlexW2810702248MaRDI QIDQ2054005FDOQ2054005

Michael Dietrich, Phillip Honenberger

Publication date: 30 November 2021

Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1845-1

Recommendations

• Publication:4888318
• Dynamic Epistemic Logic and Knowledge Puzzles
• The basis problem for epistemological disjunctivism revisited
• A logico-epistemic investigation of Frauchiger and Renner's paradox
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 589737
• A new approach to epistemic logic
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1999226
• Epistemic logic, relevant alternatives, and the dynamics of context
• A formal approach to the problem of logical non-omniscience
• scientific article

zbMATH Keywords

inference to the best explanationBayesian confirmation theoryerror statisticsDuhem's problemElliott SoberLindley Darden

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Foundations and philosophical topics in statistics (62A01) Bayesian problems; characterization of Bayes procedures (62C10) Logic in the philosophy of science (03A10)

Cites Work

• The Bayesian treatment of auxiliary hypotheses
• Bayesian personalism, the methodology of scientific research programmes, and Duhem's problem
• Bayesian Confirmation and Auxiliary Hypotheses Revisited: A Reply to Strevens

Cited In (1)

• The basis problem for epistemological disjunctivism revisited

This page was built for publication: Duhem's problem revisited: logical versus epistemic formulations and solutions

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2054005)