Duhem's problem revisited: logical versus epistemic formulations and solutions

DOI10.1007/S11229-018-1845-1MaRDI QIDQ2054005zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Michael Dietrich, Phillip Honenberger

Publication date 30 November 2021

Published in Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1845-1

zbMATH Keywords

inference to the best explanationBayesian confirmation theoryerror statisticsDuhem's problemElliott SoberLindley Darden

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Foundations and philosophical topics in statistics (62A01) Bayesian problems; characterization of Bayes procedures (62C10) Logic in the philosophy of science (03A10)

Recommendations

• Publication:4888318
• Dynamic Epistemic Logic and Knowledge Puzzles
• The basis problem for epistemological disjunctivism revisited
• A logico-epistemic investigation of Frauchiger and Renner's paradox
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 589737
• A new approach to epistemic logic
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1999226
• Epistemic logic, relevant alternatives, and the dynamics of context
• A formal approach to the problem of logical non-omniscience
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 140409

Cites work

• Bayesian Confirmation and Auxiliary Hypotheses Revisited: A Reply to Strevens
• Bayesian personalism, the methodology of scientific research programmes, and Duhem's problem
• The Bayesian treatment of auxiliary hypotheses

Cited in

(2)

• Falsifiability, empirical content and the Duhem-Quine problem
• The basis problem for epistemological disjunctivism revisited

This page was built for publication: Duhem's problem revisited: logical versus epistemic formulations and solutions

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2054005)