Do weak values capture the complete truth about the past of a quantum particle?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2074537
Abstract: Weak values inferred from weak measurements have been proposed as a tool to investigate trajectories of pre- and post-selected quantum systems. Are the inferences drawn from the weak values about the past of a quantum particle fully true? Can the two-state vector formalism predict everything that the standard formalism of quantum mechanics can? To investigate these questions we present a "which-path" gedanken experiment in which the information revealed by a pre- and post-selected quantum system is surprisingly different from what one would expect from the weak values computed using the two-state vector formalism. In our gedanken experiment, a particle reveals its presence in locations where the weak value of the projection operator onto those locations was vanishingly small. Therefore our predictions turn out to be in contradistinction to those made based on the nonvanishing weak values as the presence indicators of the quantum particle. We propose a six port photon-based interferometer setup as a possible physical realization of our gedanken experiment.
Recommendations
Cites work
- `Quantum Cheshire Cat' as simple quantum interference
- An even simpler understanding of quantum weak values
- Asking photons where they have been in plain language
- Can a dove prism change the past of a single photon?
- Einstein, incompleteness, and the epistemic view of quantum states
- Experimental realization of the quantum box problem
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3208040 (Why is no real title available?)
- Observing the average trajectories of single photons in a two-slit interferometer
- Path probabilities for consecutive measurements, and certain ``quantum paradoxes
- Quantum Cheshire cats
- Quantum mechanics, local realistic theories, and Lorentz-invariant realistic theories
- Realism and time symmetry in quantum mechanics
- Realization of Hardy's thought experiment with photons
- Revisiting Hardy's paradox: Counterfactual statements, real measurements, entanglement and weak values
- Two-state vector formalism and quantum interference
- Weak measurements measure probability amplitudes (and very little else)
Cited in
(9)- Asking photons where they have been in plain language
- Can a future choice affect a past measurement's outcome?
- Weak measurements of trajectories in quantum systems: classical, Bohmian and sum over paths
- Past of a particle in an entangled state
- Can a dove prism change the past of a single photon?
- Quantum non-barking dogs
- Where is a photon in an interferometer?
- Security in a prepare-and-measure quantum key distribution protocol when the receiver uses weak values to guess the sender's bits
- Weak value and the wave-particle duality
This page was built for publication: Do weak values capture the complete truth about the past of a quantum particle?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2074537)