There are no Carmichael numbers of the form 2ⁿp+1 with p prime
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2080964
DOI10.5802/CRMATH.393zbMATH Open1504.11013OpenAlexW4300978941MaRDI QIDQ2080964FDOQ2080964
Authors: Florian Luca, Adel Alahmadi
Publication date: 12 October 2022
Published in: Comptes Rendus. Mathématique. Académie des Sciences, Paris (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.5802/crmath.393
Recommendations
Cites Work
- There are infinitely many Carmichael numbers
- The Impossibility of Certain Types of Carmichael Numbers
- Sierpiński and Carmichael numbers
- Primes in intervals of bounded length
- Carmichael numbers in the sequence \((2^{n} k+1)_{n\geq 1}\)
- On the density of odd integers of the form \((p-1)2^{-n}\) and related questions
Cited In (7)
- Sierpiński and Carmichael numbers
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Carmichael numbers with a totient of the form \(a^2+nb^2\)
- On Carmichael and polygonal numbers, Bernoulli polynomials, and sums of base-\(p\) digits
- Carmichael numbers in the sequence \((2^{n} k+1)_{n\geq 1}\)
- There are no socialist primes less than 10^9
- There is no Carmichael number of the form \(2^n p^2+1\) with \(p\) prime
This page was built for publication: There are no Carmichael numbers of the form \(2^np+1\) with \(p\) prime
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2080964)