A counter-example to the probabilistic universal graph conjecture via randomized communication complexity
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2081471
Abstract: We refute the Probabilistic Universal Graph Conjecture of Harms, Wild, and Zamaraev, which states that a hereditary graph property admits a constant-size probabilistic universal graph if and only if it is stable and has at most factorial speed. Our counter-example follows from the existence of a sequence of Boolean matrices , such that their public-coin randomized communication complexity tends to infinity, while the randomized communication complexity of every submatrix of is bounded by a universal constant.
Recommendations
Cites work
- A note on the Erdős-Hajnal property for stable graphs
- Biasing Boolean functions and collective coin-flipping protocols over arbitrary product distributions
- Classification theory and the number of non-isomorphic models.
- Communication Complexity
- Efficient graph representations
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1099508 (Why is no real title available?)
- Implicat Representation of Graphs
- Perfect dominating sets in the Cartesian products of prime cycles
- Regularity lemmas for stable graphs
- The communication complexity of addition
- The speed of hereditary properties of graphs
Cited in
(6)- Logical labeling schemes
- Optimal adjacency labels for subgraphs of Cartesian products
- Proof complexity and beyond. Abstracts from the workshop held March 24--29, 2024
- Small but unwieldy: a lower bound on adjacency labels for small classes
- Randomized communication and implicit graph representations
- Better boosting of communication oracles, or not
This page was built for publication: A counter-example to the probabilistic universal graph conjecture via randomized communication complexity
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2081471)