Difference between families of weakly and strongly maximal integral lattice-free polytopes

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2106280

DOI10.1007/978-3-030-98327-7_1zbMATH Open1503.52020arXiv1807.06327OpenAlexW2883199112MaRDI QIDQ2106280FDOQ2106280


Authors: Gennadiy Averkov Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 14 December 2022

Abstract: A d-dimensional closed convex set K in mathbbRd is said to be lattice-free if the interior of K is disjoint with mathbbZd. We consider the following two families of lattice-free polytopes: the family mathcalLd of integral lattice-free polytopes in mathbbRd that are not properly contained in another integral lattice-free polytope and its subfamily mathcalMd consisting of integral lattice-free polytopes in mathbbRd which are not properly contained in another lattice-free set. It is known that mathcalMd=mathcalLd holds for dle3 and, for each dge4, mathcalMd is a proper subfamily of mathcalLd. We derive a super-exponential lower bound on the number of polytopes in mathcalLdsetminusmathcalMd (with standard identification of integral polytopes up to affine unimodular transformations).


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.06327




Recommendations




Cites Work






This page was built for publication: Difference between families of weakly and strongly maximal integral lattice-free polytopes

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2106280)