Big pure mapping class groups are never perfect

DOI10.4310/MRL.2022.V29.N3.A4MaRDI QIDQ2107724FDOQ2107724

Authors: George Domat, Ryan Dickmann 

Publication date: 2 December 2022

Published in: Mathematical Research Letters (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.14929

Recommendations

• Automatic continuity of pure mapping class groups
• Mapping class groups of surfaces with noncompact boundary components
• Big mapping class groups with uncountable integral homology
• Three perfect mapping class groups
• Algebraic and topological properties of big mapping class groups

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Manifolds and cell complexes (57-XX) Group theory and generalizations (20-XX)

Cited In (13)

• Automatic continuity of pure mapping class groups
• Mapping class groups of surfaces with noncompact boundary components
• Surface Houghton groups
• Self-similar surfaces: involutions and perfection
• Big mapping class groups and the co-Hopfian property
• Big mapping class groups are not acylindrically hyperbolic
• Big pure mapping class groups are never perfect
• Homeomorphism groups of self-similar 2-manifolds
• Big mapping class groups with uncountable integral homology
• Homeomorphism groups of 2-manifolds with the virtual Rokhlin property
• Stable commutator length on big mapping class groups
• Asymptotic mapping class groups of Cantor manifolds and their finiteness properties (with an appendix by Oscar Randal-Williams)
• Big mapping class groups are not extremely amenable

This page was built for publication: Big pure mapping class groups are never perfect

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2107724)