On preserving the computational content of mathematical proofs: toy examples for a formalising strategy
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2117791
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 65537 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3548474 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6983477 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3216998 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3278867 (Why is no real title available?)
- Applied Proof Theory: Proof Interpretations and Their Use in Mathematics
- Computable analysis and notions of continuity in \textsc{Coq}
- Effective asymptotic regularity for one-parameter nonexpansive semigroups
- Effective moduli from ineffective uniqueness proofs. An unwinding of de La Vallée Poussin's proof for Chebycheff approximation
- Effective rates of convergence for the resolvents of accretive operators
- Formalising mathematics -- in praxis; a mathematician's first experiences with Isabelle/HOL and the why and how of getting started
- On the Interpretation of Non-Finitist Proofs--Part I
- On the interpretation of non-finitist proofs–Part II
- Opinion: The Mechanization of Mathematics
- PROOF-THEORETIC METHODS IN NONLINEAR ANALYSIS
- Proof mining for nonlinear operator theory. Four case studies on accretive operators, the Cauchy problem and nonexpansive semigroups
- Proofs and computations
- Rates of convergence and metastability for abstract Cauchy problems generated by accretive operators
- The computational content of classical arithmetic
Cited in
(2)
This page was built for publication: On preserving the computational content of mathematical proofs: toy examples for a formalising strategy
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2117791)