Matroids are not Ehrhart positive

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2136552

DOI10.1016/J.AIM.2022.108337zbMATH Open1487.52022arXiv2105.04465OpenAlexW3161963287MaRDI QIDQ2136552FDOQ2136552

Luis Ferroni

Publication date: 11 May 2022

Published in: Advances in Mathematics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: In this article we disprove the conjectures asserting the positivity of the coefficients of the Ehrhart polynomial of matroid polytopes by De Loera, Haws and K"oppe (2007) and of generalized permutohedra by Castillo and Liu (2015). We prove constructively that for every ngeq19 there exist connected matroids on n elements that are not Ehrhart positive. Also, we prove that for every kgeq3 there exist connected matroids of rank k that are not Ehrhart positive. Our proofs rely on our previous results on the geometric interpretation of the operation of circuit-hyperplane relaxation and our formulas for the Ehrhart polynomials of hypersimplices and minimal matroids. This allows us to give a precise expression for the Ehrhart polynomials of all sparse paving matroids, a class of matroids which is conjectured to be predominant and which contains the counterexamples arising from our construction.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.04465




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (8)





This page was built for publication: Matroids are not Ehrhart positive

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2136552)