Decision theory and large deviations for dynamical hypotheses tests: the Neyman-Pearson lemma, min-max and Bayesian tests

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2140235

DOI10.3934/JDG.2021031zbMATH Open1486.62017arXiv2101.08227OpenAlexW4205883758MaRDI QIDQ2140235FDOQ2140235


Authors: Hermes H. Ferreira, A. O. Lopes, Sílvia R. C. Lopes Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 20 May 2022

Published in: Journal of Dynamics and Games (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We analyze hypotheses tests using classical results on large deviations to compare two models, each one described by a different H"older Gibbs probability measure. One main difference to the classical hypothesis tests in Decision Theory is that here the two measures are singular with respect to each other. Among other objectives, we are interested in the decay rate of the wrong decisions probability, when the sample size n goes to infinity. We show a dynamical version of the Neyman-Pearson Lemma displaying the ideal test within a certain class of similar tests. This test becomes exponentially better, compared to other alternative tests, when the sample size goes to infinity. We are able to present the explicit exponential decay rate. We also consider both, the Min-Max and a certain type of Bayesian hypotheses tests. We shall consider these tests in the log likelihood framework by using several tools of Thermodynamic Formalism. Versions of the Stein's Lemma and Chernoff's information are also presented.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.08227




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (2)





This page was built for publication: Decision theory and large deviations for dynamical hypotheses tests: the Neyman-Pearson lemma, min-max and Bayesian tests

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2140235)