How to prove Hume's law

DOI10.1007/S10992-021-09643-3MaRDI QIDQ2144208zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Gillian Russell

Publication date 1 June 2022

Published in Journal of Philosophical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Copyright license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-021-09643-3

zbMATH Keywords

barriers to entailmentHume's lawinvaliditylogical consequencephilosophical logic

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Mathematical logic and foundations (03-XX)

Recommendations

• Is, ought, and cut
• Hume's is-ought thesis in logics with alethic-deontic bridge principles
• Recent thought on is and ought: connections, confluences and rediscoveries
• How far can Hume's is-ought thesis be generalized? An investigation in alethic-deontic modal predicate logic
• Beall-ing \(\mathbb{O}\)

Cites work

• How far can Hume's is-ought thesis be generalized? An investigation in alethic-deontic modal predicate logic
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1028832 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3271460 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3328981 (Why is no real title available?)
• Indexicals, context-sensitivity and the failure of implication
• Recent thought on is and ought: connections, confluences and rediscoveries
• The is-ought problem. An investigation in philosophical logic
• Truthmaking and the is-ought gap

Cited in

(1)

• Is, ought, and cut

This page was built for publication: How to prove Hume's law

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2144208)