A paraconsistent approach to deal with epistemic inconsistencies in argumentation
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2146014
Recommendations
- An epistemic approach to paraconsistency: a logic of evidence and truth
- On formal aspects of the epistemic approach to paraconsistency
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2019884
- Publication:4888318
- Paraconsistent logic, evidence, and justification
- Epistemic argumentation framework: theory and computation
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5997429
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5997434
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 140409 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2019859 (Why is no real title available?)
- A general account of argumentation with preferences
- A generalized proof-theoretic approach to logical argumentation based on hypersequents
- An axiomatic analysis of structured argumentation with priorities
- Conflict-free and conflict-tolerant semantics for constrained argumentation frameworks
- Conflict-tolerant semantics for argumentation frameworks
- Fundamental properties of attack relations in structured argumentation with priorities
- Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties
- Logical argumentation by dynamic proof systems
- On inference from inconsistent premisses
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
- The anomalous extension problem in default reasoning
- Two aspects of relevance in structured argumentation: minimality and paraconsistency
Cited in
(2)
This page was built for publication: A paraconsistent approach to deal with epistemic inconsistencies in argumentation
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2146014)
