Abstract: The syntactic structure of a sentence can be modelled as a tree, where vertices correspond to words and edges indicate syntactic dependencies. It has been claimed recurrently that the number of edge crossings in real sentences is small. However, a baseline or null hypothesis has been lacking. Here we quantify the amount of crossings of real sentences and compare it to the predictions of a series of baselines. We conclude that crossings are really scarce in real sentences. Their scarcity is unexpected by the hubiness of the trees. Indeed, real sentences are close to linear trees, where the potential number of crossings is maximized.
Recommendations
Cites work
- A critical point for random graphs with a given degree sequence
- Complex networks. Structure, robustness and function.
- Constrained Markovian dynamics of random graphs
- Enumeration of noncrossing trees on a circle
- Handbook of Linguistic Annotation
- Networks. An introduction.
- The Random Walk Construction of Uniform Spanning Trees and Uniform Labelled Trees
- The Structure and Function of Complex Networks
- The asymptotic number of labeled graphs with given degree sequences
- The scaling of the minimum sum of edge lengths in uniformly random trees
Cited in
(3)
This page was built for publication: Are crossing dependencies really scarce?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2148382)