Are crossing dependencies really scarce?

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2148382

DOI10.1016/J.PHYSA.2017.10.048zbMATH Open1504.05285arXiv1703.08324OpenAlexW2603928290MaRDI QIDQ2148382FDOQ2148382


Authors: Ramon Ferrer-i-Cancho, C. Gómez-Rodríguez, Juan Luis Esteban Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 23 June 2022

Published in: Physica A (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: The syntactic structure of a sentence can be modelled as a tree, where vertices correspond to words and edges indicate syntactic dependencies. It has been claimed recurrently that the number of edge crossings in real sentences is small. However, a baseline or null hypothesis has been lacking. Here we quantify the amount of crossings of real sentences and compare it to the predictions of a series of baselines. We conclude that crossings are really scarce in real sentences. Their scarcity is unexpected by the hubiness of the trees. Indeed, real sentences are close to linear trees, where the potential number of crossings is maximized.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.08324




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (3)





This page was built for publication: Are crossing dependencies really scarce?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2148382)