Comment on ``A loophole of all `loophole-free' Bell-type theorems
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2152385
DOI10.1007/S10699-020-09695-9zbMATH Open1490.81022arXiv2008.00369OpenAlexW3102924339MaRDI QIDQ2152385FDOQ2152385
Authors: Justo Pastor Lambare
Publication date: 8 July 2022
Published in: Foundations of Science (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: In a recent article (Found Sci (2020) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-020-09666-0) Marek Czachor claims that the Bell inequality cannot be proved because variables of complementary measurements cannot be added or multiplied. Even though he has correctly identified the problems existing with the orthodox interpretation of the Bell inequality and dealt with them in an original way, the interpretation he addresses do not pertain to the original formulation given by John Stewart Bell.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.00369
Recommendations
- A loophole of all `loophole-free' Bell-type theorems
- The contextuality loophole is fatal for the derivation of Bell inequalities: Reply to a comment by I. Schmelzer
- COMMENT ON "ON THE ROLE OF LOCALITY CONDITION IN BELL'S THEOREM"
- On the CHSH form of Bell's inequalities
- Bell's theorem: critique of proofs with and without inequalities
Cites Work
- Statistics, causality and Bell's theorem
- Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories
- Bell inequalities, counterfactual definiteness and falsifiability
- A loophole of all `loophole-free' Bell-type theorems
- On Nieuwenhuizen's treatment of contextuality in Bell's theorem
- On the CHSH form of Bell's inequalities
Cited In (8)
- About a ``contextuality loophole in Bell's theorem claimed to exist by Nieuwenhuizen
- On the relevance of Bell's probabilistic model for spin correlations
- What's wrong with this rebuttal?
- The digital computer as a metaphor for the perfect laboratory experiment: loophole-free Bell experiments
- A loophole of all `loophole-free' Bell-type theorems
- The contextuality loophole is fatal for the derivation of Bell inequalities: Reply to a comment by I. Schmelzer
- A note on Bell's theorem logical consistency
- On the CHSH form of Bell's inequalities
This page was built for publication: Comment on ``A loophole of all `loophole-free' Bell-type theorems
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2152385)