Is being ``robust beneficial? A perspective from the Indian market

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2166065

DOI10.1007/S10690-021-09331-XzbMATH Open1495.91105arXiv1908.05002OpenAlexW3147088136MaRDI QIDQ2166065FDOQ2166065


Authors: Mohammed Bilal Girach, Shashank Oberoi, Siddhartha P. Chakrabarty Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 23 August 2022

Published in: Asia-Pacific Financial Markets (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: The problem of data uncertainty has motivated the incorporation of robust optimization in various arenas, beyond the Markowitz portfolio optimization. This work presents the extension of the robust optimization framework for the minimization of downside risk measures, such as Value-at-Risk (VaR) and Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR). We perform an empirical study of VaR and CVaR frameworks, with respect to their robust counterparts, namely, Worst-Case VaR and Worst-Case CVaR, using the market data as well as the simulated data. After discussing the practical usefulness of the robust optimization approaches from various standpoints, we infer various takeaways. The robust models in the case of VaR and CVaR minimization exhibit superior performance with respect to their base versions in the cases involving higher number of stocks and simulated setup respectively.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.05002




Recommendations




Cites Work






This page was built for publication: Is being ``robust beneficial? A perspective from the Indian market

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2166065)