Numerical comparisons of finite element stabilized methods for a 2D vortex dynamics simulation at high Reynolds number

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2174134

DOI10.1016/J.CMA.2019.02.013zbMATH Open1441.76051arXiv1804.03009OpenAlexW2912287485WikidataQ128360638 ScholiaQ128360638MaRDI QIDQ2174134FDOQ2174134


Authors: Naveed Ahmed, Samuele Rubino Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 20 April 2020

Published in: Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: In this paper, we consider up-to-date and classical Finite Element (FE) stabilized methods for time-dependent incompressible flows. All studied methods belong to the Variational MultiScale (VMS) framework. So, different realizations of stabilized FE-VMS methods are compared in high Reynolds numbers vortex dynamics simulations. In particular, a fully Residual-Based (RB)-VMS method is compared with the classical Streamline-Upwind Petrov--Galerkin (SUPG) method together with grad-div stabilization, a standard one-level Local Projection Stabilization (LPS) method, and a recently proposed LPS method by interpolation. These procedures do not make use of the statistical theory of equilibrium turbulence, and no ad-hoc eddy viscosity modeling is required for all methods. Applications to the simulations of high Reynolds numbers flows with vortical structures on relatively coarse grids are showcased, by focusing on two-dimensional plane mixing-layer flows. Both Inf-Sup Stable (ISS) and Equal Order (EO) FE pairs are explored, using a second-order semi-implicit Backward Differentiation Formula (BDF2) in time. Based on the numerical studies, it is concluded that the SUPG method using both ISS and EO FE pairs performs best among all methods. Furthermore, there seems to be no reason to extend SUPG method by the higher order terms of the RB-VMS method.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.03009




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (19)

Uses Software





This page was built for publication: Numerical comparisons of finite element stabilized methods for a 2D vortex dynamics simulation at high Reynolds number

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2174134)