On the axiomatisability of priority. III: Priority strikes again
DOI10.1016/J.TCS.2020.07.044zbMATH Open1452.68124OpenAlexW3047624070MaRDI QIDQ2193294FDOQ2193294
Authors: Luca Aceto, Elli Anastasiadi, Valentina Castiglioni, Anna Ingolfsdottir, Bas Luttik, Mathias Ruggaard Pedersen
Publication date: 25 August 2020
Published in: Theoretical Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2020.07.044
Recommendations
Logic in computer science (03B70) Models and methods for concurrent and distributed computing (process algebras, bisimulation, transition nets, etc.) (68Q85)
Cites Work
- Asymptotic Enumeration of Partial Orders on a Finite Set
- Deciding bisimilarity is P-complete
- Structural operational semantics.
- Process algebra for synchronous communication
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Bisimulation can't be traced
- Three Partition Refinement Algorithms
- Handbook of process algebra
- Formal verification of parallel programs
- The algebra of communicating processes with empty process
- Process algebra: equational theories of communicating processes. With forewords by Tony Hoare, Robin Milner and Jan Bergstra.
- Priority in process algebra.
- The meaning of negative premises in transition system specifications
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Transition system specifications with negative premises
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Processes, Terms and Cycles: Steps on the Road to Infinity
- On the axiomatizability of priority. II
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Bisimilarity is not finitely based over BPA with interrupt
- On the Axiomatizability of Priority
Cited In (7)
- On the expressibility of priority
- On the axiomatisability of priority
- On the axiomatizability of priority. II
- Bisimilarity is not finitely based over BPA with interrupt
- On the Axiomatizability of Priority
- Non-finite axiomatisability results via reductions: CSP parallel composition and CCS restriction
- Are Two Binary Operators Necessary to Obtain a Finite Axiomatisation of Parallel Composition?
This page was built for publication: On the axiomatisability of priority. III: Priority strikes again
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2193294)