Learning a tree-structured Ising model in order to make predictions

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2196190



Abstract: We study the problem of learning a tree Ising model from samples such that subsequent predictions made using the model are accurate. The prediction task considered in this paper is that of predicting the values of a subset of variables given values of some other subset of variables. Virtually all previous work on graphical model learning has focused on recovering the true underlying graph. We define a distance ("small set TV" or ssTV) between distributions P and Q by taking the maximum, over all subsets mathcalS of a given size, of the total variation between the marginals of P and Q on mathcalS; this distance captures the accuracy of the prediction task of interest. We derive non-asymptotic bounds on the number of samples needed to get a distribution (from the same class) with small ssTV relative to the one generating the samples. One of the main messages of this paper is that far fewer samples are needed than for recovering the underlying tree, which means that accurate predictions are possible using the wrong tree.


The objective of this paper is to show that learning a model that makes accurate predictions is possible even when structure learning is not. For realizing of this objective, the authors introduced a loss function to evaluate learning algorithms based on the accuracy of low-order marginals. The small-set total variation between true distribution \(P\) and learned distribution \(Q\) is used. The main result gives lower and upper bounds on the number of samples needed to learn a tree Ising model to ensure small \(L^{(2)}\) loss, which in this setting is equivalent to accurate pairwise marginals. In fact, the main result concerns the maximum likelihood tree (also called Chow-Liu tree, see [\textit{C. K. Chow} and \textit{C. N. Liu}, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 14, 462--467 (1968; Zbl 0165.22305)]. At the end of the paper, some interesting numerical simulations to demonstrate the performance of the Chow-Liu algorithm in terms of both the probability of incorrect recovery of underlying structure (zero-one loss) and the \(L^{(2)}\) loss are presented.



Cites work









This page was built for publication: Learning a tree-structured Ising model in order to make predictions

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2196190)