Worst-case versus average-case design for estimation from partial pairwise comparisons

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2196209

DOI10.1214/19-AOS1838zbMATH Open1452.62561arXiv1707.06217MaRDI QIDQ2196209FDOQ2196209


Authors: Ashwin Pananjady, Cheng Mao, Vidya Muthukumar, Martin J. Wainwright, Thomas A. Courtade Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 28 August 2020

Published in: The Annals of Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Pairwise comparison data arises in many domains, including tournament rankings, web search, and preference elicitation. Given noisy comparisons of a fixed subset of pairs of items, we study the problem of estimating the underlying comparison probabilities under the assumption of strong stochastic transitivity (SST). We also consider the noisy sorting subclass of the SST model. We show that when the assignment of items to the topology is arbitrary, these permutation-based models, unlike their parametric counterparts, do not admit consistent estimation for most comparison topologies used in practice. We then demonstrate that consistent estimation is possible when the assignment of items to the topology is randomized, thus establishing a dichotomy between worst-case and average-case designs. We propose two estimators in the average-case setting and analyze their risk, showing that it depends on the comparison topology only through the degree sequence of the topology. The rates achieved by these estimators are shown to be optimal for a large class of graphs. Our results are corroborated by simulations on multiple comparison topologies.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.06217




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (8)

Uses Software





This page was built for publication: Worst-case versus average-case design for estimation from partial pairwise comparisons

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2196209)