The initial set in the frog model is irrelevant
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2201527
DOI10.1214/20-ECP329zbMATH Open1469.60321arXiv1912.10085OpenAlexW3045189182MaRDI QIDQ2201527FDOQ2201527
Authors: Maria Deijfen, Sebastian Rosengrenï
Publication date: 29 September 2020
Published in: Electronic Communications in Probability (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: In this note, we consider the frog model on and a two-type version of it with two types of particles. For the one-type model, we show that the asymptotic shape does not depend on the initially activated set and the configuration there. For the two-type model, we show that the possibility for the types to coexist in that both of them activate infinitely many particles does not depend on the choice of the initially activated sets and the configurations there.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.10085
Recommendations
Cites Work
- Phase transition for the frog model
- The shape theorem for the frog model
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Branching and tree indexed random walks on fractals
- The two-type Richardson model with unbounded initial configurations
- The Initial Configuration is Irrelevant for the Possibility of Mutual Unbounded Growth in the Two-Type Richardson Model
- Recurrence and transience of frogs with drift on \(\mathbb{Z}^d\)
- Competing frogs on \({\mathbb Z}^d\)
Cited In (6)
- The asymptotic shape theorem for the frog model on finitely generated abelian groups
- Coexistence of lazy frogs on \(\mathbb{Z}\)
- On transience of frogs on Galton-Watson trees
- Competing frogs on \({\mathbb Z}^d\)
- Sensitivity of the frog model to initial conditions
- Continuity for the asymptotic shape in the frog model with random initial configurations
This page was built for publication: The initial set in the frog model is irrelevant
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2201527)