A new formulation using the Schur complement for the numerical existence proof of solutions to elliptic problems: without direct estimation for an inverse of the linearized operator

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2217873

DOI10.1007/S00211-020-01155-7zbMATH Open1456.65035arXiv1910.00759OpenAlexW3094361996MaRDI QIDQ2217873FDOQ2217873


Authors: Kouta Sekine, Mitsuhiro T. Nakao, Shin'ichi Oishi Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 11 January 2021

Published in: Numerische Mathematik (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Infinite-dimensional Newton methods can be effectively used to derive numerical proofs of the existence of solutions to partial differential equations (PDEs). In computer-assisted proofs of PDEs, the original problem is transformed into the infinite Newton-type fixed point equation w=mathcalL1mathcalF(hatu)+mathcalL1mathcalG(w), where mathcalL is a linearized operator, mathcalF(hatu) is a residual, and mathcalG(w) is a local Lipschitz term. Therefore, the estimations of |mathcalL1mathcalF(hatu)| and |mathcalL1mathcalG(w)| play major roles in the verification procedures. In this paper, using a similar concept as the `Schur complement' for matrix problems, we represent the inverse operator mathcalL1 as an infinite-dimensional operator matrix that can be decomposed into two parts, one finite dimensional and one infinite dimensional. This operator matrix yields a new effective realization of the infinite-dimensional Newton method, enabling a more efficient verification procedure compared with existing methods for the solution of elliptic PDEs. We present some numerical examples that confirm the usefulness of the proposed method. Related results obtained from the representation of the operator matrix as mathcalL1 are presented in the appendix.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.00759




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (5)





This page was built for publication: A new formulation using the Schur complement for the numerical existence proof of solutions to elliptic problems: without direct estimation for an inverse of the linearized operator

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2217873)