Natural density and the quantifier ``most

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2228451

DOI10.1007/S10849-019-09312-4zbMATH Open1477.03113arXiv1901.10394OpenAlexW2997940562MaRDI QIDQ2228451FDOQ2228451

A. Sinan Çevik, Selçuk Topal

Publication date: 17 February 2021

Published in: Journal of Logic, Language and Information (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: This paper proposes a formalization of the class of sentences quantified by extit{most}, which is also interpreted as {em proportion of} or {em majority of} depending on the domain of discourse. We consider sentences of the form " extit{Most A are B}", where extit{A} and extit{B} are plural nouns and the interpretations of A and B are infinite subsets of mathbbN. There are two widely used semantics for extit{Most A are B}: (i) C(AcapB)>C(AsetminusB) and (ii) C(AcapB)>dfracC(A)2, where C(X) denotes the cardinality of a given finite set X. Although (i) is more descriptive than (ii), it also produces a considerable amount of insensitivity for certain sets. Since the quantifier {em most} has a solid cardinal behaviour under the interpretation {em majority} and has a slightly more statistical behaviour under the interpretation {em proportional of}, we consider an alternative approach in deciding quantity-related statements regarding infinite sets. For this we introduce a new semantics using {em natural density} for sentences in which interpretations of their nouns are infinite subsets of mathbbN, along with a list of the axiomatization of the concept of natural density. In other words, we take the standard definition of the semantics of extit{most} but define it as applying to finite approximations of infinite sets computed to the limit.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.10394




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (1)





This page was built for publication: Natural density and the quantifier ``most

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2228451)