Structural gravity and trade agreements: does the measurement of domestic trade matter?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2236282
DOI10.1016/J.ECONLET.2021.110080zbMATH Open1471.91295OpenAlexW3178122503MaRDI QIDQ2236282FDOQ2236282
Authors: Rodolfo G. Campos, Jacopo Timini, Elena Vidal Edit this on Wikidata
Publication date: 22 October 2021
Published in: Economics Letters (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2021.110080
Recommendations
- Trade flows and spatial effects: The gravity model revisited
- ESTIMATING BORDER EFFECTS: THE IMPACT OF SPATIAL AGGREGATION
- Stochastic varying coefficients gravity model: An application in trade analysis
- Semiparametric estimation of varying trade elasticities in gravity
- Indirect measures of trade costs: limitations and caveats
Cites Work
Cited In (7)
- Structural gravity and trade agreements: does the measurement of domestic trade matter?
- Trade flows and spatial effects: The gravity model revisited
- Using machine learning to capture heterogeneity in trade agreements
- Indirect measures of trade costs: limitations and caveats
- Does distance matter for trade in services? The case of interprovincial trade in Canada
- What does ``doing business really measure? Evidence from trade times
- Stochastic varying coefficients gravity model: An application in trade analysis
This page was built for publication: Structural gravity and trade agreements: does the measurement of domestic trade matter?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2236282)
