From (secure) w-domination in graphs to protection of lexicographic product graphs

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2239006




Abstract: Let w=(w0,w1,dots,wl) be a vector of nonnegative integers such that w0ge1. Let G be a graph and N(v) the open neighbourhood of vinV(G). We say that a function f:V(G)longrightarrow0,1,dots,l is a w-dominating function if f(N(v))=sumuinN(v)f(u)gewi for every vertex v with f(v)=i. The weight of f is defined to be omega(f)=sumvinV(G)f(v). Given a w-dominating function f and any pair of adjacent vertices v,uinV(G) with f(v)=0 and f(u)>0, the function fuightarrowv is defined by fuightarrowv(v)=1, fuightarrowv(u)=f(u)1 and fuightarrowv(x)=f(x) for every xinV(G)setminusu,v. We say that a w-dominating function f is a secure w-dominating function if for every v with f(v)=0, there exists uinN(v) such that f(u)>0 and fuightarrowv is a w-dominating function as well. The (secure) w-domination number of G, denoted by (gammaws(G)) gammaw(G), is defined as the minimum weight among all (secure) w-dominating functions. In this paper, we show how the secure (total) domination number and the (total) weak Roman domination number of lexicographic product graphs GcircH are related to gammaws(G) or gammaw(G). For the case of the secure domination number and the weak Roman domination number, the decision on whether w takes specific components will depend on the value of gamma(1,0)s(H), while in the case of the total version of these parameters, the decision will depend on the value of gamma(1,1)s(H).









This page was built for publication: From (secure) \(w\)-domination in graphs to protection of lexicographic product graphs

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2239006)