Mathematical perspectives on liar paradoxes

DOI10.1007/S11787-021-00277-2MaRDI QIDQ2239380zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Lorena Segura-Abad, Kristian Alonso-Stenberg, Hugh Gash, J. L. Usó-Domènech, Josué Antonio Nescolarde-Selva

Publication date 3 November 2021

Published in Logica Universalis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-021-00277-2

zbMATH Keywords

determined compatible propositionsincompatible propositionsliar paradoxlogicmetalanguageparadoxsystems

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

History of Greek and Roman mathematics (01A20) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Logics of knowledge and belief (including belief change) (03B42)

Review text

Looking at paradoxes of the liar type, the authors present four interpretations for them. The first is Tarski's, involving language levels, the second deals with conceptual volume and involves the notions of indeterminate compatible propositions or indeterminate propositions, the third approach involves self-referentiality, mutual exclusion, implication, and universal antinomy, and the fourth, which relies on the authors' own research, involves dialetheism, non-monotonous logical approaches, and fuzzy logic.

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2101947
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 497626
• Intensional paradoxes
• Intuitionism and the liar paradox
• A contextual-hierarchical approach to truth and the liar paradox

Cites work

• An approach to paraconsistent multivalued logic: evaluation by complex truth values
• Buridan's solution to the liar paradox
• Doubt truth to be a liar
• Four valued semantics and the Liar
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 43479 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3099243 (Why is no real title available?)
• Jump liars and Jourdain's card via the relativized T-scheme
• Non-deterministic conditionals and transparent truth
• Notes on Leitgeb's Ruitenburg
• Outline of a Theory of Truth
• Proposal for the formalization of dialectical logic
• Saving truth from paradox
• The logic of paradox
• What truth depends on

Cited in

(13)

• Mathematics of philosophy or philosophy of mathematics?
• An illocutionary logical explanation of the liar paradox
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 497626 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 698630 (Why is no real title available?)
• Computational verb systems: The paradox of the liar
• On \(t\) and \(u\), and what they can do
• Fixed-point models for paradoxical predicates
• Paradox of analyticity and related issues
• From paradox to judgment: towards a metaphysics of expression
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2229034 (Why is no real title available?)
• Equality and Near-Equality in a Nonstandard World
• On the structural properties of paradoxes: the distinction between formal language and natural language that comes with the use of the liar paradox
• The generalised liar paradox: A quantum model and interpretation

This page was built for publication: Mathematical perspectives on liar paradoxes

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2239380)