Count outcome meta-analysis for comparing treatments by fusing mixed data sources: comparing interventions using across report information

DOI10.1007/S10182-020-00370-9MaRDI QIDQ2245663zbMATHOpenAlexFDO

Authors Patarawan Sangnawakij, Dankmar Böhning

Publication date 15 November 2021

Published in AStA. Advances in Statistical Analysis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Copyright license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s10182-020-00370-9

zbMATH Keywords

meta-analysisdata fusionmixed information

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Estimation in multivariate analysis (62H12)

Recommendations

• Comparison of Meta-Analysis Versus Analysis of Variance of Individual Patient Data
• Estimation of effect heterogeneity in rare events meta-analysis
• The use of two-way linear mixed models in multitreatment meta-analysis
• Validity of regression meta-analyses versus pooled analyses of mixed effect linear models
• On the Equivalence of Meta‐Analysis Using Literature and Using Individual Patient Data

Cites work

• Introduction to Meta‐Analysis
• Meta-analysis with R

Cited in

(2)

• An XML based framework for merging incomplete and inconsistent statistical information from clinical trials
• Nonparametric estimation of the random effects distribution for the risk or rate ratio in rare events meta-analysis with the arm-based and contrast-based approaches

Describes a project that uses

Uses Software

• Stata
• netmeta

This page was built for publication: Count outcome meta-analysis for comparing treatments by fusing mixed data sources: comparing interventions using across report information

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2245663)