Count outcome meta-analysis for comparing treatments by fusing mixed data sources: comparing interventions using across report information

DOI10.1007/S10182-020-00370-9MaRDI QIDQ2245663zbMATHOpenAlexFDO

Authors Patarawan Sangnawakij, Dankmar Böhning

Publication date 15 November 2021

Published in AStA. Advances in Statistical Analysis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s10182-020-00370-9

zbMATH Keywords

meta-analysisdata fusionmixed information

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Estimation in multivariate analysis (62H12)

Recommendations

• Comparison of Meta-Analysis Versus Analysis of Variance of Individual Patient Data
• Estimation of effect heterogeneity in rare events meta-analysis
• The use of two-way linear mixed models in multitreatment meta-analysis
• Validity of regression meta-analyses versus pooled analyses of mixed effect linear models
• On the Equivalence of Meta‐Analysis Using Literature and Using Individual Patient Data

Cites work

• Introduction to Meta‐Analysis
• Meta-analysis with R

Cited in

(2)

• An XML based framework for merging incomplete and inconsistent statistical information from clinical trials
• Nonparametric estimation of the random effects distribution for the risk or rate ratio in rare events meta-analysis with the arm-based and contrast-based approaches

Describes a project that uses

Uses Software

• Stata
• netmeta

This page was built for publication: Count outcome meta-analysis for comparing treatments by fusing mixed data sources: comparing interventions using across report information

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2245663)