Remarks on the identifiability of Thurstonian ranking models: Case V, Case III, or neither?

DOI10.1007/BF02294376zbMath1291.62247MaRDI QIDQ2250630

Rung-Ching Tsai

Publication date: 18 July 2014

Published in: Psychometrika (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02294376

zbMATH Keywords

identifiability; Thurstonian models; ranking data

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

62P15: Applications of statistics to psychology

Related Items

Models for paired comparison data: a review with emphasis on dependent data, Linking item response model parameters, Equivalent linear logistic test models, A Bayesian multinomial probit model for the analysis of panel choice data, Identifiability and equivalence of GLLIRM models, A hierarchical model for accuracy and choice on standardized tests, Two-level linear paired comparison models: Estimation and identifiability issues, Limited information estimation and testing of Thurstonian models for preference data, Remarks on the identifiability of Thurstonian paired comparison models under multiple judgment, The repeated insertion model for rankings: missing link between two subset choice models, Thurstonian-based analyses: past, present, and future utilities

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• A maximum likelihood method for fitting the wandering vector model
• Factor and ideal point analysis for interpersonally incomparable data
• The wandering ideal point model: A probabilistic multidimensional unfolding model for paired comparisons data
• Thurstonian psychophysics: Case III
• Covariance structure analysis of ordinal ipsative data
• A solution for case III of the law of comparative judgment
• A Conditional Probit Model for Qualitative Choice: Discrete Decisions Recognizing Interdependence and Heterogeneous Preferences
• A GENERAL PROCEDURE FOR PARAMETER ESTIMATION FOR THE LAW OF COMPARATIVE JUDGEMENT
• Multistage Ranking Models
• An Approach for Quantifying Paired Comparisons and Rank Order