On the relationship between the higher-order factor model and the hierarchical factor model
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2250666
Recommendations
Cites work
Cited in
(20)- Commentary on coefficient alpha: a cautionary tale
- The ultrametric correlation matrix for modelling hierarchical latent concepts
- Gibbs sampling using the data augmentation scheme for higher-order item response models
- Second-order disjoint factor analysis
- Positive loadings and factor correlations from positive covariance matrices
- CFA models with a general factor and multiple sets of secondary factors
- Direct Schmid-Leiman transformations and rank-deficient loadings matrices
- A deflated indicators approach for estimating second-order reflective models through PLS-PM: an empirical illustration
- Identifiability of Bifactor Models
- Analysis of NMAR missing data without specifying missing-data mechanisms in a linear latent variate model
- Hierarchical disjoint principal component analysis
- A two-tier full-information item factor analysis model with applications
- Bi-factor and second-order copula models for item response data
- A general theorem and proof for the identification of composed CFA models
- Going deep in diagnostic modeling: deep cognitive diagnostic models (DeepCDMs)
- A multidimensional model to facilitate within person comparison of attributes
- Exploratory bi-factor analysis
- Exact exploratory bi-factor analysis: a constraint-based optimization approach
- Fitting multilevel factor models
- Lord-Wingersky algorithm version 2.0 for hierarchical item factor models with applications in test scoring, scale alignment, and model fit testing
This page was built for publication: On the relationship between the higher-order factor model and the hierarchical factor model
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2250666)