On the DEA total weight flexibility and the aggregation in cross-efficiency evaluations
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2253390
DOI10.1016/j.ejor.2012.06.011zbMath1292.90293OpenAlexW2051914789MaRDI QIDQ2253390
Inmaculada Sirvent, José Luis Ruiz
Publication date: 27 July 2014
Published in: European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.06.011
Fractional programming (90C32) Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50) Special problems of linear programming (transportation, multi-index, data envelopment analysis, etc.) (90C08)
Related Items (8)
Efficiency evaluation with cross-efficiency in the presence of undesirable outputs in stochastic environment ⋮ A new Monte Carlo based procedure for complete ranking efficient units in DEA models ⋮ Data envelopment analysis based on team reasoning ⋮ Evaluating and Managing Tramp Shipping Lines Performances: A New Methodology Combining Balanced Scorecard and Network DEA ⋮ Data envelopment analysis cross efficiency evaluation with reciprocal behaviors ⋮ Cross-efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis based on prospect theory ⋮ Ranking Decision Making Units: The Cross-Efficiency Evaluation ⋮ Cross-efficiency evaluation with directional distance functions
Cites Work
- Measuring the efficiency of decision making units
- Choosing weights from alternative optimal solutions of dual multiplier models in DEA
- A multiplier bound approach to assess relative efficiency in DEA without slacks
- A unified framework for the selection of a flexible manufacturing system
- Weights restrictions and value judgements in data envelopment analysis: Evolution, development and future directions
- In the determination of weight sets to compute cross-efficiency ratios in DEA
- Efficiency and Cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, Meanings and Uses
- Programming with linear fractional functionals
This page was built for publication: On the DEA total weight flexibility and the aggregation in cross-efficiency evaluations