Some remarks on the n-linear Hilbert transform for n 4
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2255339
DOI10.4310/MRL.2014.V21.N5.A11zbMATH Open1381.42034arXiv1209.6391MaRDI QIDQ2255339FDOQ2255339
Authors: Camil Muscalu
Publication date: 9 February 2015
Published in: Mathematical Research Letters (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: We prove that for every integer , the -linear operator whose symbol is given by a product of two generic symbols of -linear Hilbert transform type, does not satisfy any estimates similar to those in H"{o}lder inequality. Then, we extend this result to multi-linear operators whose symbols are given by a product of an arbitrary number of generic symbols of -linear Hilbert transform kind. As a consequence, under the same assumption ,these immediately imply that for any and with , there exist non-degenerate subspaces of maximal dimension , and Mikhlin symbols singular along , for which the associated -linear multiplier operators do not map into . These counterexamples are in sharp contrast with the bi-linear case, where similar operators are known to satisfy many such estimates.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1209.6391
Recommendations
- A few remarks about the Hilbert transform
- A note about multi-Hilbert transform on \(\mathcal D(\mathbb R^n)\)
- A NOTE ON HILBERT TRANSFORMS
- A Note on Hilbert Transforms
- The Fourier, Hilbert, and Mellin Transforms on a Half-Line
- Remarks on the Hilbert transform and on some families of multiplier operators related to it
- A note on the Hilbert transform
- On the bilinear Hilbert transform
- Some remarks on \(n\)-dimensional Laplace transforms
- A note on approximating finite Hilbert transform and quadrature formula
Cited In (1)
This page was built for publication: Some remarks on the \(n\)-linear Hilbert transform for \(n \geq 4\)
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2255339)